Select Page

What Is the Current Percentage of Zombie Foreclosures in the U.S.?

In the second quarter of 2026, the share of zombie foreclosures across the United States remained a small portion of properties in the foreclosure process.

Residential Properties Nationwide in the Process of Foreclosure: 245,376

Percentage of Zombie Foreclosures: 3.4 percent of residential properties in the foreclosure process were considered “zombie” properties — homes that sit vacant while in pre-foreclosure status.

What’s Driving Q2 2026 Zombie Foreclosure Trends?

In the second quarter of 2026, zombie foreclosure activity remained limited relative to total foreclosure volume nationwide. The data shows 8,312 vacant pre-foreclosure properties among 245,376 residential properties in the foreclosure process, with state-level rates varying across the ranking.

Zombie Foreclosure Rates by State – Q2 2026

Below is the complete state-by-state ranking for the second quarter of 2026, listing each state’s share of zombie foreclosure properties and the top four counties leading in percentage of total vacant properties.

1. Vermont

12.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (2 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Chittenden

2. Kansas

11.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (71 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Wyandotte, Shawnee, Sedgwick, Johnson

3. Iowa

8.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (126 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Black Hawk, Scott, Linn, Polk

4. Wyoming

8.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (10 zombie foreclosures)

5. West Virginia

7.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (5 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Kanawha

6. Missouri

7.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (67 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Saint Louis City, Saint Louis, Jackson, Greene

7. Oregon

7.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (50 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Multnomah, Jackson, Marion, Lane

8. North Dakota

7.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (11 zombie foreclosures)

9. Ohio

6.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (675 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Mahoning, Lucas, Cuyahoga, Montgomery

10. Indiana

6.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (294 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Lake, Marion, St Joseph, Vanderburgh

11. New Mexico

6.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (48 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Santa Fe, Bernalillo, Dona Ana, Sandoval

12. Oklahoma

6.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (87 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Oklahoma, Tulsa, Cleveland, Canadian

13. Maryland

6.4 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (127 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Baltimore City, Baltimore, Prince George’s County, Worcester

14. Alaska

5.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (10 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Anchorage

15. South Dakota

5.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (4 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Minnehaha

16. Nebraska

4.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (16 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Douglas, Lancaster, Sarpy

17. Illinois

4.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (685 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Saint Clair, Peoria, Madison, Rock Island

18. Minnesota

4.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (60 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Saint Louis, Hennepin, Ramsey, Olmsted

19. Montana

4.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (8 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Yellowstone

20. Hawaii

3.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (71 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Hawaii, Honolulu, Maui

21. Kentucky

3.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (37 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Jefferson, Kenton, Fayette

22. Pennsylvania

3.9 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (229 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Schuylkill, Beaver, Allegheny, Luzerne

23. Colorado

3.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (73 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pueblo, Denver, Arapahoe, Boulder

24. Michigan

3.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (78 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Wayne, Genesee, Saginaw, Berrien

25. Washington

3.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (53 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Spokane, Pierce, Yakima, Kitsap

26. Florida

3.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (2519 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pinellas, Sarasota, Collier, Volusia

27. Arkansas

3.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (13 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pulaski, Washington, Benton

28. Delaware

3.5 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (19 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: New Castle, Kent, Sussex

29. Wisconsin

3.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (48 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Milwaukee, Winnebago, Rock, Racine

30. Tennessee

3.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (23 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Shelby, Hamilton, Sullivan, Montgomery

31. Georgia

3.2 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (101 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Bibb, Richmond, Muscogee, Clayton

32. Nevada

3.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (47 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Clark, Washoe

33. New York

3.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (1352 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Broome, Niagara, Oneida, Schenectady

34. North Carolina

3.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (102 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Forsyth, Gaston, Cumberland, New Hanover

35. Arizona

3.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (72 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Pima, Mohave, Maricopa, Yuma

36. Alabama

2.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (35 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Montgomery, Jefferson, Mobile, Tuscaloosa

37. Mississippi

2.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (8 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Hinds, Harrison, De Soto

38. Texas

2.7 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (201 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Jefferson, Lubbock, Galveston, Nueces

39. Idaho

2.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (12 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Ada, Kootenai, Canyon

40. Maine

2.6 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (15 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Penobscot, York, Cumberland

41. South Carolina

2.3 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (150 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Beaufort, Horry, Anderson, Aiken

42. Connecticut

2.2 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (15 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Southeastern Connecticut, South Central Connecticut, Naugatuck Valley, Greater Bridgeport

43. California

2.2 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (324 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Riverside, Los Angeles, San Luis Obispo, San Diego

44. Louisiana

2.1 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (29 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Caddo, Calcasieu, East Baton Rouge, Orleans

45. Virginia

2.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (25 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Richmond City, Norfolk City, Virginia Beach City, Arlington

46. Massachusetts

1.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (50 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Barnstable, Berkshire, Suffolk, Essex

47. Utah

1.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (30 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Washington, Salt Lake, Weber, Utah

48. Rhode Island

1.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (1 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Washington, Kent, Providence

49. New Hampshire

1.0 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (2 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Rockingham, Hillsborough

50. New Jersey

0.8 percent of residential properties in the process of foreclosure during the second quarter were vacant or zombie foreclosures (203 zombie foreclosures)

Counties: Cape May, Middlesex, Atlantic, Essex

Conclusion

Zombie foreclosures remain a small share of overall foreclosure activity nationwide in Q2 2026. States at the top of the ranking posted higher zombie foreclosure rates relative to others, though overall levels remained limited compared with total foreclosure activity.

For full details, explore ATTOM’s Q2 2026 Vacant Property and Zombie Foreclosure Report to examine state, MSA, county, and zip code level data.

ATTOM is a leading source for property and mortgage data. Contact an ATTOM representative to find out how we can further serve your data needs.

 

Interested in purchasing the data cited in our articles?

Or learn more about how businesses are leveraging ATTOM’s property and real estate data? Please complete the form below to connect with a data expert.